Re: Monitoring number of backends
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Monitoring number of backends |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5516.1382474665@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Monitoring number of backends (andy <andy@squeakycode.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Monitoring number of backends
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
andy <andy@squeakycode.net> writes:
> On 10/22/2013 2:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> that style of php programming, you're getting some HUGE overhead in
>> connect/disconnect per web page. putting pg_bouncer in the middle
>> will make a HUGE improvement, possibly a second per page load on a busy
>> server.
> No, actually, I don't think my connect overhead is huge. My apache and
> postgres are on the same box, and it connects using unix socket.
You're ignoring the fact that PG backends have a pretty considerable
startup transient. By the time a backend has gotten its caches populated
enough to be efficient, it's expended a lot of cycles. You might be
getting away with this approach under low load, but it will bite you in
painful places eventually.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: