Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> btw, I'm all for fixing pg_group (it is really nonoptional imho) and
> the ODBC stuff is noncritical since loading the contrib/odbc/odbc.sql
> is sufficient to get the functions or operators defined since the
> support code is already in the backend.
OK, I thought you might want to argue more strongly for adding the
ODBC stuff while we had the chance ... but if you are happy with the
status quo then I'm happy.
regards, tom lane