On 12/03/2014 09:30 PM, M Tarkeshwar Rao wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Thanks Adrian for you quick reply. I am looking in this that why db came into this stage.
>
> --I have found overheating servers to be particularly prone to index corruption and if indexes can get corrupt one
hasto worry about data becoming ---corrupt too.
>
> Is the above statement true?
All I can say is that equipment is designed to run in a range of
temperatures. The temperature goes outside that range and the chance
increases that something will go wrong. Whether that affects indexes
more is not something I could say.
> What is the meaming of toasted values?
> What is this pg_toast? Can you please share any link on this?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/storage-toast.html
>
> Note from the shared link
> --------------------------------------
>
> Given that what you did was a reindex, what probably happened was it used an index scan to try to locate the toasted
valuesin the table and couldnt find one. This sounds like a corrupted index. Vacuum analyse does alter the table but
reindexdoes not and the changes are very minor.
>
> The way to think about this is that TOASTed attributes are actually broken into chunks of about 4k in size and these
arestored in rows. They are looked up and sorted/reconnected with the main row at query time. It sounds like an index
usedhere was corrupted and so the reindex solved the problem.
>
> I have found corrupted indexes are usually a sign that something is not well with the server. It is good to check and
makesure memory, CPU's and hard drives are all happy and not reporting problems. I have found overheating servers to be
particularlyprone to index corruption and if indexes can get corrupt one has to worry about data becoming corrupt too.
>
>
> Regards
> Tarkeshwar
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com