On 10/15/2014 03:54 PM, I wrote:
>
> On 10/15/2014 07:38 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I checked a code, and I have only two small objection - a name
>> "jsonb_object_two_arg" is not good - maybe "json_object_keys_values" ?
>
> It's consistent with the existing json_object_two_arg. In all cases I
> think I kept the names the same except for changing "json" to "jsonb".
> Note that these _two_arg functions are not visible at the SQL level -
> they are only visible in the C code.
>
> I'm happy to be guided by others in changing or keeping these names.
If we really want to change the name of json_object_two_arg, it would
probably be best to change it NOW in 9.4 before it gets out into a
production release at all.
Thoughts?
cheers
andrew