Re: Should there be a charcat?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Should there be a charcat?
Дата
Msg-id 5437.1160165442@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Should there be a charcat?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Ответы Re: Should there be a charcat?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> I would think that c || 'x' would result in 'x                    x',
> but it doesn't

We did it that way up through 7.3, but changed because we concluded the
behavior was inconsistent.  The behavior of char(N) these days is that
the padding spaces are not semantically significant, which means that
they effectively are not there for anything except display purposes.

If we didn't do this, we would have situations where, for example,
A = B but (A || 'x') != (B || 'x').  Does that strike you as a good idea?

If you're interested you can probably find more discussion in the
archives from mid-2003 or so.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Should there be a charcat?
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: array_accum aggregate