Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5268FBDC.10106@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24.10.2013 13:02, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > Another difference AFAICS is that checksum feature needs the block to be > backed up only after the first time a hint bit is updated after checkpoint. > But for something like pg_rewind to work, we will need to WAL log every > hint bit update on a page. So we would want to keep it as short as possible. To fix that, pg_rewind could always start the rewinding process from the last checkpoint before the point that the histories diverge, instead of the exact point of divergence. That would make the rewinding more expensive as it needs to read through a lot more WAL, but I think it would still be OK. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: