Re: Why the asprintf patch is still breaking the buildfarm
| От | Manlio Perillo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why the asprintf patch is still breaking the buildfarm |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 52663A64.2030600@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Why the asprintf patch is still breaking the buildfarm (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why the asprintf patch is still breaking the buildfarm
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/10/2013 09:58, Tom Lane wrote: > So I returned from vacation only to find that the buildfarm has a bad case > of acne. All the Windows members are red or pink, and have been for > awhile. Sigh. > > After some research I believe that I understand the reason for the CHECK > failures, at least: > > 1. src/port/asprintf.c exhibits a truly touching faith that vsnprintf will > report exactly the number of bytes that would have been required, even if > the buffer is not that large. While this is what is specified in recent > versions of the POSIX standard, older platforms have much sketchier > behavior. > Just to be pedantic, this is required by C99. > [...] Regards Manlio Perillo
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: