On 9/19/13 2:08 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I think so similar frameworks will be exists (we have some similar
> Probably You and me have a same opinion so only simple and very primitive
> assert is not enough:
>
> I see as useful feature for assertions:
>
> a) possibility to specify a message (two parametric assert)
> b) possibility to specify some threshold
> c) possibility to specify some level (exception, warning, notice) ..
> default should be exception
> c) possibility to specify a handled/unhandled exception
I think these are all neat ideas on how to further improve this feature. I'd like to see at least a) in 9.4, but I
haven'tyet looked at how it
could be implemented.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja