Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function...

You're saying as oppose to straight SQL? I don't think so; but I had
defined it as such just in case there was some functional benefit that I
might be unaware of...

========================
On 08/06/2013 01:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Pavel Stehule escribió:
>
>> you code can be translated to
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE
>> FUNCTION GROUP_CONCAT_ATOM(field1 TEXT, field2 TEXT, delimiter TEXT)
>>          RETURNS TEXT AS $$
>> BEGIN
>>   RETURN COALESCE(field1||delimiter||field2, field2, field1);
>> END;
>> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
> Actually you don't even need plpgsql for this, do you ..
>