Re: Time for an autoconf update

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Time for an autoconf update
Дата
Msg-id 5115475F.7050906@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Time for an autoconf update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Time for an autoconf update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/8/13 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64,
> which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html
> 
> We are behind the curve.

What they actually mean is that they need config.guess and config.sub
that is shipped with autoconf 2.69.  But the ones in the postgresql
source tree are already of the required version.

The reason I haven't been pushing for autoconf updates in a while is
that the release notes of recent versions consist mostly of "fix
regression in previous release" and no actual features that would be of
use in PostgreSQL's configure script.  This should be revisited from
time to time, but it's probably better to do that near the beginning of
a development cycle.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Следующее
От: Ivan Lezhnjov IV
Дата:
Сообщение: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups