On 2023-12-12 Tu 10:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2023-Dec-12, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> writes:
>>> When you add exceptions, it starts to complicate the UI.
>> Indeed. It seems like --silent-diff was poorly defined and poorly
>> named, and we need to rethink that option along the way to adding
>> this behavior. The idea that --show-diff and --silent-diff can
>> be used together is just inherently confusing, because they sound
>> like opposites
> Maybe it's enough to rename --silent-diff to --check. You can do
> "--show-diff --check" and get both the error and the diff printed; or
> just "--check" and it'll throw an error without further ado; or
> "--show-diff" and it will both apply the diff and print it.
>
That seems reasonable. These features were fairly substantially debated
when we put them in, but I'm fine with some tweaking. But note:
--show-diff doesn't apply the diff, it's intentionally non-destructive.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com