On 29.06.2012 18:28, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> It would be nice if there was at least a thin layer of the sender
> portion which could by used by a stand-alone program. I can think
> of lots of useful reasons to "T" the WAL stream -- passing through
> the stream with little or no modification to at least one side. As
> just one example, I would like a program to write traditional WAL
> files to match what an archive on the sending side would look like
> while passing the stream through to an asynchronous hot standby.
That isn't really related to the logical replication stuff, but I agree
that would be cool. You can sort of do that with cascading replication,
but a thin stand-alone program would be nicer.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com