On 24.11.2011 07:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, that is a heap table. My only guess is that the heap is being
>> created without binary_upgrade_next_heap_pg_class_oid being set.
>> Looking at the code, I can't see how the heap could be created without
>> this happening. Another idea is that pg_dumpall isn't output the proper
>> value, but again, how is this data type different from the others.
>
> I have reproduced the failure and found it was code I added to pg_dump
> back in 9.0. The code didn't set the index oid for exclusion constraint
> indexes. Once these were added to the regression tests for range types
> recently, pg_upgrade threw an error.
>
> My assumption is that anyone trying to use an exclusion constraint with
> pg_upgrade will get the same type of error.
>
> Patch attached. Should it be backpatched to 9.0 and 9.1?
If I understood correctly, pg_upgrade of a database with exclusion
constraints won't work without this patch? In that case, it should be
backpatched.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com