On 04/20/2011 01:50 AM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> Also, the number of erase cycles you can get, over the whole disk, is
> quite large on modern disks!
>
> So large that you'll probably go decades before you wear the disk out,
> even with continual writes.
>
> Don't buy into the SSD FUD myths..
There is no FUD being spread here. Particularly given the PostgreSQL
WAL write pattern, it's not impossible to wear out a SSD placed there in
a small number of years. A system with a trivial but not completely
idle workload will generate one 16MB WAL segment every 5 minutes, which
works out to 4.5GB/day of writes. That's the baseline--the reality is
much, much higher than that on most systems. The fact that every row
update can temporarily use more than 8K means that actual write
throughput on the WAL can be shockingly large. The smallest customer I
work with regularly has a 50GB database, yet they write 20GB of WAL
every day. You can imagine how much WAL is generated daily on systems
with terabyte databases.
As for what this translates into in the real world, go read
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/BANLkTi=GsyBfq+ApWPR_qCA7AN+NqT=zww@mail.gmail.com
as one worked out sample. Anyone deploying PostgreSQL onto MLC can't
necessarily ignore this issue.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books