Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..
| От | John R Pierce |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language.. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D9A1A13.1000606@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language.. (Martin Gainty <mgainty@hotmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..
Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language.. Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language.. |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 04/04/11 12:07 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to > maintain interpreted language.. > to whom might you be alluding to I only used a few of those adjectives, and prefixed them by hypothetical. to be honest, I would expect most languages commonly used in web service environments to be more efficient at string processing than pl/pgsql, and I really can't think of a counterexample off the top of my head.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: