On 29.03.2011 20:20, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I doubt that this is going to matter much, and should only have a
> trivial impact on shared space calculations and postmaster and
> connection startup time, but just as a matter of principle we might
> want to set SHMEM_INDEX_SIZE at least as large as the number of
> entries in ShmemIndex. At startup that seems to be 40 as of current
> HEAD.
>
> Trivial patch attached.
Ok, committed.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com