Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D13C8FC.4030500@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/23/10 7:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I haven't looked at the patch yet, but I think we should continue to
> allow superuser-ness to be *sufficient* for replication - i.e.
> superusers will automatically have the replication privilege just as
> they do any other - and merely allow this as an option for when you
> want to avoid doing it that way.
Yes. Currently I already create a separate "replicator" superuser just
so that I can simply track which connections belong to replication. It
would be great if it could make the "replicator" user less than a superuser.
If we still make it possible for "postgres" to replicate, then we don't
add any complexity to the simplest setup.
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: