Re: bit datatype and getObject()

Kris Jurka  wrote:
 
> The standard says nothing useful.  Section 8.3.3 of this document
> implies that as an application developer you should just pretend
> multi-bit strings don't exist...
 
BitSet is tempting, but the fuzzy definition of size seems to be a
killer.  We clearly don't want to use length() instead of size(). 
Unless someone can make a convincing argument to the contrary, I'm
inclined to agree that we should just us a Java String of '0' and
'1' characters.
 
-Kevin