Re: MVCC performance issue
От
Mladen Gogala
Тема
Re: MVCC performance issue
Дата
Msg-id
4CE07FB6.2000404@vmsinfo.com
Ответ на
Re: MVCC performance issue (Marti Raudsepp)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
MVCC performance issue "Kyriacos Kyriacou" <kyriacosk@prime-tel.com>
Re: MVCC performance issue Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Re: MVCC performance issue Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>
Re: MVCC performance issue Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Re: MVCC performance issue Rich <rhdyes@gmail.com>
Re: MVCC performance issue Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Re: MVCC performance issue Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>
Re: MVCC performance issue Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Re: MVCC performance issue Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Marti Raudsepp wrote: > > > Another advantage of Oracle's approach seems that they need much less > tuple-level overhead. IMO the 23-byte tuple overhead is a much bigger > drawback in Postgres than table fragmentation. > > Regards, > Marti > > Oracle, however, does have a problem with "ORA-1555 Snapshot too old", precisely because of their implementation of MVCC. In other words, if your query is running long and Oracle is not able to reconstruct the old rows from the UNDO segments, you're out of luck and your query will die. The greatest burden of the Postgres implementation is the fact that there is no row id, so that the table header and the indexes need to be updated much more frequently than is the case with Oracle. -- Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA 1500 Broadway New York, NY 10036 (212) 329-5251 www.vmsinfo.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления