Re: ask for review of MERGE
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ask for review of MERGE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CC4A780.10301@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ask for review of MERGE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ask for review of MERGE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > Well, there's no guarantee that any index at all exists on the target > table, so any solution based on index locks can't be fully general. > Sure, but in the most common use case I think we're targeting at first, no indexes means there's also no unique constraints either. I don't think people can reasonable expect to MERGE or anything else to guarantee they won't accidentally create two rows that conflict via the terms of some non-database enforced key. I am too brain-dead this particular Sunday to think of exactly how to deal with the 3-tuple case you described, except to say that I think it's OK for complicated situations to give up and throw a serialization error. I'm already collecting a list of pathological tests and will try to add something based on your problem case, then see what we can do with it later. -- Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: