On 23/09/10 11:34, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> In the meantime our DBs are not able to keep in sync via WAL
> replication, that would need some kind of parallel WAL restore on the
> slave I guess, or I'm not able to configure it properly - in any case
> now we use slony which is working.
It would be interesting to debug that case a bit more. Was bottlenecked
by CPU or I/O, or network capacity perhaps?
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com