Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5?
От
Greg Smith
Тема
Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5?
Дата
Msg-id
4C1B0C11.1010204@2ndquadrant.com
Ответ на
Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5? (Mark Mielke)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5? Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5? Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5? Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5? Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: wal_synch_method = open_sync safe on RHEL 5.5? Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Mark Mielke wrote: > The conclusion I read was that Linux O_SYNC behaves like O_DSYNC on > other systems. For WAL, this seems satisfactory? It would be if it didn't have any bugs or limitiations, but it does. The one pointed out in the message I linked to suggests that a mix of buffered and O_SYNC direct I/O can cause a write error, with the exact behavior you get depending on the kernel version. That's a path better not explored as I see it. The kernels that have made some effort to implement this correctly actually expose O_DSYNC, on newer Linux systems. My current opinion is that if you only have Linux O_SYNC, don't use it. The ones with O_DSYNC haven't been around for long enough to be proven or disproven as effective yet. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления