Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Дата
Msg-id 4C191F46.4060408@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  ("jgardner@jonathangardner.net" <jgardner@jonathangardner.net>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Jonathan Gardner <jgardner@jonathangardner.net>)
Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
> * fsync=off => 5,100
> * fsync=off and synchronous_commit=off => 5,500

Now, this *is* interesting ... why should synch_commit make a difference
if fsync is off?

Anyone have any ideas?

> tmpfs, WAL on same tmpfs:
> * Default config: 5,200
> * full_page_writes=off => 5,200
> * fsync=off => 5,250
> * synchronous_commit=off => 5,200
> * fsync=off and synchronous_commit=off => 5,450
> * fsync=off and full_page_writes=off => 5,250
> * fsync=off, synchronous_commit=off and full_page_writes=off => 5,500

So, in this test, it seems like having WAL on tmpfs doesn't make a
significant difference for everything == off.

I'll try running some tests on Amazon when I have a chance.  It would be
worthwhile to get figures without Python's "ceiling".

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Следующее
От: Juan Pablo Sandoval Rivera
Дата:
Сообщение: Confirm calculus