Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4C0AD180.90607@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL (Jon Schewe <jpschewe@mtu.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jon Schewe wrote: > The tests were all done on an opensuse 11.2 64-bit machine, > on the same hard drive (just ran mkfs between each test) on the same > input with the same code base. So no controller card, just the motherboard and a single hard drive? If that's the case, what you've measured is which filesystems are safe because they default to flushing drive cache (the ones that take around 15 minutes) and which do not (the ones that take >=around 2 hours). You can't make ext3 flush the cache correctly no matter what you do with barriers, they just don't work on ext3 the way PostgreSQL needs them to. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: