Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Oh, I wasn't proposing doing *anything* for 9.0.  I wanted to get
> something on the TODO list for 9.1.  As far as I'm concerned, 9.0 is
> closed to new ideas.  We have enough bugs to fix as it is.
>   

I didn't get that initially from how you characterized this as "past 
time" to add.  It's at 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Point-In-Time_Recovery_.28PITR.29 now.

-- 
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us