On 2/24/10 5:58 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
>
> I though about that for a minute, but didn't think pg_stop_backup is a
> common enough operation that anyone will complain that it's a little
> more verbose in its logging now. I know when I was new to this, I used
> to wonder just what it was busy doing just after executing this command
> when it hung there for a while sometimes, and would have welcomed this
> extra bit of detail--preferably immediately, not even after a 5 or 10
> second delay.
+1
--Josh