Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4B7D533F.20601@dunslane.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > >> Doesn't that require that all pgindent runs produce the same output? >> Which they generally don't due to different sets of typedefs and >> stuff? It's a solvable problem of course, but not quite as simple as >> you make it sound :-) >> > > The typedef file emitted by the buildfarm is supposed to be rather > static, no? > > Umm, static in what sense? Clearly if we add things to the code that can involve extra typedefs being found. The buildfarm's list is the union of all the typedefs found by the contributing members at the time they do their runs. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: