Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline
Дата
Msg-id 4B702E05.1000708@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Ответы Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline
Список pgsql-performance
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I'll keep this in mind as something to try if we have problem
> performance in line with what that page describes, though....
>

That's basically what I've been trying to make clear all along:  people
should keep an open mind, watch what happens, and not make any
assumptions.  There's no clear cut preference for one scheduler or the
other in all situations.  I've seen CFQ do much better, you and Albe
report situations where the opposite is true.  I was just happy to see
another report of someone running into the same sort of issue I've been
seeing, because I didn't have very much data to offer about why the
standard advice of "always use deadline for a database app" might not
apply to everyone.

--
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline