Re: CommitFest status/management

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: CommitFest status/management
Дата
Msg-id 4B149574.9020904@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CommitFest status/management  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: CommitFest status/management  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
>
> If the need here is to speed up how fast things are fed to committers, 
> we can certainly do that.  The current process still favors having 
> reviewers do as much as possible first, as shown by all the stuff 
> sitting in the re-review queue.  The work we're waiting on them for 
> could be done by the committers instead if we want to shorten the 
> whole process a bit.  I don't think that's really what you want though.
>

As I have observed before, I think we need some infrastructure to help 
committers claim items, so we don't duplicate work.

Right now the only items marked "ready for reviewer" are Streaming 
Replication and Hot Standby, which I imagine Heiki will be handling.

I'm going to look at the YAML format for EXPLAIN patch shortly.

cheers

andrew




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CommitFest status/management
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SE-PgSQL patch review