Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Дата
Msg-id 4A81A1D5.1090805@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Список pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not sure there's a
> good solution to this problem short of making pgindent easy enough
> that we can make it a requirement for patch submission, and I'm not
> sure that's practical.
>
> But in any case, I think running pgindent immediately after the last
> CommitFest rather than after a longish delay would be a good idea.
>
>   


Frankly, fixing up patch bitrot caused by pgindent is not terribly 
difficult in my experience - bitrot caused by code drift is a much 
harder problem (and yes, git fans, I know git can help with that).

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "Hot standby"?