Re: very slow selects on a small table

Tom Lane [tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] wrote:
> This seems like kind of a stupid plan anyway (which PG version was this
> exactly?) but certainly the big issue is the catastrophically bad
> rowcount estimate for the indexscan.  Do you have ANALYZE stats for
> ts_stats_transetgroup_user_daily at all (look in pg_stats)?
postgres 8.3.5. Yes, here's a count(*) from pg_stats:

cemdb=# select count(*) from pg_stats where
tablename='ts_stats_transetgroup_user_daily';
  count
-------
    186
(1 row)


Thanks,
Brian