Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A04B1CE.7090601@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Joshua, On 05/09/2009 12:22 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Obviously, an unchecked cvs diff would have produced the same garbage. Any >> other problems? > There are a number of conceptual differences. For example as a majority > svn user, svn diff does not act the way git diff does. In that svn diff > will only give me the difference within the current working directory. > It will not go to the beginning of the tree and give me a diff. git diff . Although admittedly that takes some time getting used to. > Perhaps a more difficult problem is that there is no easy way to update > a single file within a git repo. In cvs or svn, if I blow something up > on a particular file and I just want to take a fresh look, I just rm;svn > update. git checkout HEAD [--] your_file Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: