Re: ARC patent

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Held
Тема Re: ARC patent
Дата
Msg-id 49E94D0CFCD4DB43AFBA928DDD20C8F902618497@asg002.asg.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: ARC patent  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: ARC patent  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: ARC patent  ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marian POPESCU [mailto:softexpert@libertysurf.fr]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:06 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ARC patent
>
> >>>Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFAICS the
> >>>>patent application is still pending, although the USPTO
> >>>>site is a little hard to grok):
> >>>
> >>>Ugh.  We could hope that the patent wouldn't be granted,
> >>>but I think it unlikely, unless Jan is aware of prior art
> >>>(like a publication predating the filing date).  I fear we'll
> >>>have to change or remove that code.

Why not just ask IBM for a free license first?  After all, they put
1,000+ patents in the public domain or something, didn't they?  I
realize that they might use this technology in DB2, and don't want
to encourage competitors.  But IBM seems a lot more friendly to OSS
than most companies, and it doesn't seem like it would hurt to ask.
At the worst they say "no" and you just proceed as you would have
originally.

__
David B. Held
Software Engineer/Array Services Group
200 14th Ave. East,  Sartell, MN 56377
320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mark Woodward"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New FLOSS survey
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TSearch2 performance issue?