weaknesses and strenghts of PG
От | Thomas Finneid |
---|---|
Тема | weaknesses and strenghts of PG |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 498D5CF4.6050404@fcon.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG
Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I am researching an advocation paper on Postgres. Basically I would like to make a list of the most important strengths and weaknesses of Postgres compared to a couple of other major databases. The aim is to have a factual technical background for when advocating Postgres to potential users. Specifically I would like to compare: - PG - MySql - Oracle - MS SQL server - Firebird the facts I am looking for is about the core functionality and application use aspects, while the answers I am looking for, is for example whether - one db more or less suited for GIS or warehouse or ... - one db is not well suited for performance operations - if there are types of operations a database is not good at, or conversely, is extremely good at. No DB can be the best on all application types, so my focus is on figuring out where PG is better than other DBs, where it is not and where it is evenly matched. regards thomas
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: