Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
>> IIRC, my last patch includes a partial validation code for RESET cases. For
>> example, the last SQL will not be atomic (invalid reloption silently ignored).
>> So, why not apply the namespace validation code to RESET case too? Patch is
>> attached too.
>
> No, we must not validate the options passed to RESET, because we want to
> be able to reset even options that we do not currently think that are
> valid. Consider that we might be trying to clean up after options set
> by a previous version of a module.
>
Ah, idea withdrawn. But we should at least document this behavior.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/