Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4933.1440519390@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Hmm ... what do you think of wording the error as "there is no label "foo"
> attached to any block enclosing this statement"? That still leaves the
> terminology "block" undefined, but it seems better than "any statement
> enclosing this statement".
Actually, looking at the plpgsql documentation, I see that it is
completely consistent about using the word "block" to refer to
[DECLARE]/BEGIN/END. So we probably can't get away with using the term in
a vaguer sense here. So the wording would have to be "there is no label
"foo" attached to any block or loop enclosing this statement". That's a
tad verbose, but at least it's clear ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: