Re: Slow updates, poor IO
От | John Huttley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slow updates, poor IO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48DD6BAB.8040302@mib-infotech.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slow updates, poor IO (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slow updates, poor IO
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Greg, I've got 32M shared on a 1G machine and 16 checkpoint segments. I'll run some tests against 64 segments and see what happens. Your previous postings were extremely helpful wrt the MVCC issue. I thank you! -john Greg Smith wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, John Huttley wrote: > >> running update file set perms='0664' took about 10 mins > > What do you have checkpoint_segments and shared_buffers set to? If > you want something that's doing lots of updates to perform well, you > need to let PostgreSQL have a decent size chunk of memory to buffer > the index writes with, so it's more likely they'll get combined into > larger and therefore more easily sorted blocks rather than as more > random ones. The randomness of the writes is why your write rate is > so slow. You also need to cut down on the frequency of checkpoints > which are very costly on this type of statement. > > Also: which version of PostgreSQL? 8.3 includes an improvement aimed > at updates like this you might benefit from. > > -- > * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: