Re: Statement level trigger clarification
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Statement level trigger clarification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48D1DE52.2050900@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Statement level trigger clarification (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Chris Velevitch wrote: >> I have a function that sets new.last_modified := current_timestamp; Remember that current_timestamp is stable across the lifetime of a transaction; it'll return the same value each time it is called. Given that, you can just use it in a row-level trigger, knowing that a batch of records updated by the same transaction (which to the database is "at the same time") will get the same timestamp. There are also time functions that return the real wall clock, and the clock at the time of the start of the statement rather than the transaction. See: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-CURRENT You do still pay the overhead of invoking a PL/PgSQL trigger for each record altered/inserted, but there doesn't seem to be much of a way around that. It's an area where a `DEFAULT FORCE' qualifier would be nice - something to ignore user-submitted input and overwrite it with the default parameter, probably a function call. At present there's nothing like that (as far as I know) so you need to use a row-level trigger. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: