Hi,
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think the
> way to go here is to have Markus open up his Monotone repo, or convince
> him to migrate it to Git, but I really doubt that's ever going to
> happen.
He he... good guess ;-)
However, as much as I personally like monotone and as much as I dislike
git for being a bad rip off of monotone, git certainly has its merits.
It has a much larger users base and is faster than monotone for some
operations.
Having used subversion, CVS and monotone for Postgres-R, I think I'm now
giving git a try. I'm about to setup the necessary repositories, but I'm
still having a hard time grokking this tool set. (And yes, I'm missing
some features compared to monotone. In our case, the most obvious one is
'mtn diff --context' ;-) )
Regards
Markus