Re: Commitfest process
| От | Robert Lor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Commitfest process |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47D1C020.6040802@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Commitfest process (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > This is reasonable for the sort of medium-to-large patch that the author > has put a lot of time into. But we also get a lot of small one-off > patches where it's not so reasonable. Now of course many of those get > applied right away, but not all. One of the services that Bruce's patch > queue has always performed is making sure stuff like that doesn't fall > through the cracks. I don't think a purely author-driven patch queue > will work to ensure that. > > We could combine the ideas: encourage authors to use the wiki, but have > someone (probably Bruce ;-)) in charge of adding stuff to the wiki if > the author doesn't. > Stefan Kaltenbrunner said a script can be written to insert an entry into the wiki automatically when a new patch comes in. That would be ideal and would avoid manual intervention. The author can still update the wiki as needed. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00433.php Regards, -Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: