Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gregory Stark escribió:
> 
>> For what it's worth I think GIT is a better fit for our needs.
> 
> Perhaps it would be, if it worked on Windows ... Not that I care, but I
> bet Magnus would.
> 

To summarize what I care about: I don't really care if I can't *commit* 
from Windows - I never do that anyway, for fear of breaking line 
endings. I do care, and a lot, if I can't pull down latest-and-greatest 
HEAD revision without risk of getting something that's not correct. 
Which means that if there is a gateway to something that works well, 
that is *stable and capable of being up to date*, I can live with that. 
(for example, doing a dump like the current svn mirror does which lags 
behind a lot, would be something I'd absolutely object to)

//Magnus