Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:00:33 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
>>
>>> I am not arguing any particular solution but home brewing a
>>> solution so people can stay on what is definitely a dying SCM is
>>> dumb. There are so many tools available to us that we *don't* have
>>> to modify, bend, break or if you like, improve that any argument
>>> outside of, "We are used to CVS" is just hand waving and that
>>> argument is sad.
>> Actually, in using Subversion I've found it broken enough that a
>> migration to it does not offer that much of an advantage over staying
>> with CVS.
>
> I repeat. I am not arguing a particular solution. I am arguing against
> creating more internal infrastructure and the relevant support
> requirements when other solutions exist.
yep - I just got a prototype install of review board running against
anoncvs.postgresql.org and it just seems to work fine at a first glance
using CVS (and postgresql for that matter). So no need for any strange
workarounds :-)
Stefan