Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> In summary, looking at possible conclusions to this discussion, I think
> we have:
>
>     1) No change
>     2) Emphasize "Postgres" more as an alternative

+1

>     3) Change the name to "PostgresQL"
>     4) Change the name to "Postgres QL"
>     5) Change the name to "Postgres"
>

- -1

Joshua D. Drake


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1yF7ATb/zqfZUUQRAl14AJ9ejuA6M6mC8pNmAC7TBAwqgVLtIgCgqdKN
EIqWKGPM1d1RyH3irlCqGHg=
=mtds
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----