Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases?
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4675491F.8070507@cox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases? (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 06/17/07 00:19, Greg Smith wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> Anyway... databases are always(?) IO bound. I'd try to figure out how >> to make a bigger hose (or more hoses) between the spindles and the mobo. > > What I keep waiting for is the drives with flash memory built-in to > mature. I would love to get reliable writes that use the drive's cache > for instant fsyncs, instead of right now where you have to push all that > to the controller level. But drive-based flash memory will always be a fixed size, and only for that drive. Controller-based cache is expandable and caches the whole RAID set (besides being battery-backed). And if you *still* need more cache, rip out that controller and put in a more expensive one, or transition to "plain" SCSI cards and a storage controller. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: