Re: ZFS and Postgresql - WASRe: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
| От | Jignesh Shah |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ZFS and Postgresql - WASRe: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4642099C.3060504@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ZFS and Postgresql - WASRe: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ZFS and Postgresql - WASRe: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
But we still pay the penalty on WAL while writing them in the first place I guess .. Is there an option to disable it.. I can test how much is the impact I guess couple of %s but good to verify :-) ) Regards, Jignesh Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Jignesh Shah escribió: > > >> Now comes the thing that I am still exploring >> * Do we do checksum in WAL ? I guess we do .. Which means that we are >> now doing double checksumming on the data. One in ZFS and one in >> postgresql. ZFS does allow checksumming to be turned off (but on new >> blocks allocated). But of course the philosophy is where should it be >> done (ZFS or PostgreSQL). >> > > Checksums on WAL are not optional in Postgres, because AFAIR they are > used to determine when it should stop recovering. > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: