hi.
Rick Schumeyer wrote:
> [...]
> From a business rules perspective:
> Some users are not employees (like an admin user)
> Some employees are not users
> [...]
from my view users and employees have something in common: they are persons.
why don't create a person-table with the attributes the groups share, like a
login-name, etc.
then your users-table will have a primary-key that is also a foreign-key,
referencing the id in the person-table and the employees-table does the same.
when you want to get all user- and employee-accounts for one person you have to
build up a join on the tables. that's a simple view, don't know what your
favourite or-mapper thinks about it.
i think the above table-design can be considered 'clean' from some academic
point of view ;)
mfg
alexander