Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
>>>> non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
>>> How frequently is this actually a problem?
>> Every single time someone submits a patch with no license but with a big
>> legal disclaimer in their signature. Which is why this all came about.
> 
> Well, if we want to guard against that, we will have to be explicit
> about it because the old wording didn't address this directly.

The wording you just posted up thread seemed to...

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/