Re: Very large IN-clause is slow, but how to rewrite it?

Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org> writes:
>> I've been profiling a PG database / mix of applications and found that
>> one statement which takes a very long time to execute is:
> 
> PG 8.2 does better with long IN-lists ... although if the list is so
> long as to be fetching a significant fraction of the table, you'll still
> have problems.  In that case I'd advise putting the values into a temp
> table, ANALYZEing same, and doing "WHERE foo IN (SELECT x FROM tmp_table)".

If 8.2, what about  ... WHERE foo IN (select x from (values (1$),(2$),...,(N$)) as t(x))
?

It would be interesting to see how that compares performance-wise.

Joe