Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 453D0FE0.8040101@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> In most cases, it would be foolish to avoid: but there are cases where > the data is CRC checked by the hardware/system already, so I'd like to > make an option to turn this off, defaulting to on, for safety. How would we know? What are those cases? Sounds like a foot gun to me. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > >> You may as well propose not writing WAL >> at all (and no, I don't think it'd pass). > > That would undo all of my efforts, so no I wouldn't consider that. > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: