Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>
>>I was trying to work around limitations with "partitioning" of tables
>>using constraint exclusion, when I ran across this little oddity:
>
> I think you're under a misimpression about the syntax behavior of ORDER
> BY and UNION. Per spec, ORDER BY binds less tightly than UNION, thus
Thanks for the explanation. Now it makes sense :-)
Joe